The Friction and Entanglements of Outdoor Education and Forest Pedagogies
Outdoor education
is becoming increasingly common in early childhood classrooms. Teachers and
early child educators take advantage of the time spent outside with students to
explore around the perimeter of school, venture out into local parks and
forests and teach the children all about the environment around them. Despite
how enriching this experience is for students, there are underlying frictions
that come with outdoor education, forest pedagogies and its connection to Indigenous
peoples and settler colonialism.
According to the Kindergarten Program, connecting
students to the natural world increases their physical, emotional, and
spiritual health and wellness. Learning outdoors fosters children’s curiosity
about the world around them (The Kindergarten Program, 2016). This demonstrates
just how important it is for children to get outside, explore, question,
wonder, inquire, experiment and enjoy what our environment has to offer.
Although outdoor education provides many benefits for children, there is an
underlying friction that frames outdoor education as being potentially problematic.
Pacini-Ketchabaw (2013) states that we must create friction when looking at
forest pedagogies and its connection to outdoor education. We need to
acknowledge how Indigenous forest ontologies and epistemologies are never
mentioned while engaging in outdoor education with children, and how this
absence is linked to the effects of settler colonialism on Indigenous histories
(Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2013). The fact that outdoor education is mentioned in the
Kindergarten program, but indigenous forest ontologies and epistemologies are
left out, confirms Pacini-Ketchabaw’s assertion that settler colonialism is
deeply rooted within our education system. It also demonstrates just how far we
need to go in acknowledging Indigenous histories and moving towards reconciliation
by first including these important histories in our early childhood
curriculums.
Pacini-Ketchabaw discusses forest pedagogies and states
that just as we shape forests when we interact within them, they interact with
us and shape us as well. She gives the example of a moss-child interaction,
where moss makes rocks slippery for little feet and poses a risk of slips and
falls, and a little hand gripping the moss to avoid falling while they climb
impacts future forests (Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2013). These are the kinds of
interactions that create frictions as we freely move and interact within the forest
without realizing the impacts we could be causing, and with little regard for
the forest pedagogies created by Indigenous peoples. Our interactions with the
forest, naming it, exploring it and making it our own, demonstrates the little
knowledge and regard we hold for indigenous traditions and interactions within
the forest throughout history, which was simply erased through the act of
settler colonialism. The history of Indigenous peoples and their close ties to
the forests, alongside the history of settlers and their complex entanglements
within colonialism, illuminates these frictions and entanglements within
outdoor education programs and forest pedagogies. It is this co-shaping of
children and forests through outdoor education that encourages us to engage
with past and present histories by asking questions, acknowledging problematic
practices, and shaping our understandings of Indigenous/settler relationships
(Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2013). I believe we must look at how settler colonialism gives
us the freedom to roam, explore and learn in forests and outdoor areas with no
regard for how and why we’re afforded these freedoms, and engage in discussions
with ourselves, our peers and out students about who is impacted because of it.
I agree with Pacini-Ketchabaw’s conclusion, which is that
while engaging in outdoor education, we must have frank discussions with
children about forest histories, forest pedagogies, and the friction that is
created due to colonialism (Pacini-Ketchabaw, 2013). We need to teach children about
interacting with the environment in respectful manner, acknowledge that we must
treat our forests with respect and leave it just as we saw it when we entered
it, and reflect on the history of the land in which we freely move upon. We
must illuminate these complex frictions and histories for our students, have
open discussions about these frictions, and teach children to interact within
forests and the environment in respectful, honourable, manner.
These settler-Indigenous
frictions must be acknowledged in order bring awareness to Canada’s complicated
history with Indigenous peoples. With this awareness, our goal is to create a
new generation of students who are aware of settler colonialism and its impacts
on Indigenous peoples, their traditions and their deep connections to the land.
We must acknowledge it consistently within outdoor education programs and work
with Indigenous peoples towards true reconciliation, starting with Indigenous
education embedded in outdoor education programs that teaches children about
their traditions, history and deep, respectful, spiritual interactions with the
land.
References
Ontario, Ministry of Education. (2016). The
Kindergarten Program, 1-328.
Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2013).
Frictions in forest pedagogies: Common worlds in settler colonial spaces. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(4),
355-365.
Hi Nicole,
ReplyDeleteYour Blog post is extremely well written and provides a thorough and thought-provoking critical analysis of Pacini-Ketchabaw “Friction in Forest Pedagogies: Common Worlds in settler Colonial spaces article and I enjoyed reading your Blog post for a wide variety of reasons. First of all, I liked how you included a summary of the article while stating your critical analysis of the frictions between Indigenous and colonial perceptions of forest pedagogies. I found this to be highly beneficial because it allowed me to be able to quickly recall the main points of the article. We share similar opinions in regards to outdoor education as being a valuable component to include in the Kindergarten Program. I think it is imperative that children are given the opportunity to go outside and explore the natural world around them through self-discovery and inquiry. This generates and fosters the way children perceive being outside and allows them to make personal connections of the importance of being environmentally conscience. However, there are frictions that are associated with outdoor education such as, when being outside looking at a forest from afar really does not capture the true essence of outdoor education. It does not teach students about the importance of respecting and taking responsibility of our natural environment. For outdoor education to be successful it is imperative to include Indigenous philosophies of environmentalism. Children need to be immersed within the forest to experience an interaction with the forest causing a mutual respect will occur. I agree, in order for this to occur Indigenous morals and beliefs need to be intertwined with environmental education and be embedded within daily classroom life. Finally, I enjoyed how you summed up your Blog post by saying it is our goal as educators to create a new generation of people who aware of colonial impacts. I like to add to this and say not just in the impacts of colonialism but how if we embrace Indigenous philosophies especial towards environmentalism, we can also achieve Indigenous reconciliation.
Thanks for sharing!